ALDOGlozeltabletDClarke. glozeltabletdcla0 Courier NewTimes New Roman`ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÀÀÀÿÿÿÿ ÿÿ BMPKHNM$´…9]9]9P9› }%›}%Ñ}%Ü}%p}%/#ê+,P,CI,I,I,) DgÚD&ÚDKÚDÀÚDÌÚDËÚDlÚD.ÚDÚDCover of book ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÀÀÀÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿGThis is an example of early Greek of 800 BC compared with the Glozel taÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÀÀÀÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ;Îÿ  ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ;Ѓÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ¾Ð Glozel page 2ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÀÀÀÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ½ÿ  ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ{Ñÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ{ÑGlozeltablet page3ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÀÀÀÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿê9ÿ ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿe ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ Untitled 43ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÀÀÀÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿhttp://ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿe beigecreamstuccoÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿðžÿÿÿÿÿbeigecreamstucco.jpgÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿþÿÿÿŒÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿñImage4ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ``ÿÿÿÿÿ Image4.gifÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿþÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ$ platovowelsÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿûÀÿÿÿÿÿplatovowels.gifÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿþÿÿÿ¬ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ«;Pelasginÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ Žÿÿÿÿÿ Pelasgin.gifÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿþÿÿÿ.›ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÙÖ frenchvowelÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÏÿÿÿÿÿfrenchvowel.gifÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿþÿÿÿ±ÂÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿŠ™ frenchworldÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ•×ÿÿÿÿÿfrenchworld.gifÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿþÿÿÿóûÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ}•glozel1ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ¬+ÿÿÿÿÿ glozel1.gifÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿþÿÿÿg{ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿä glozercoverÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿégÿÿÿÿÿglozercover.jpgÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿþÿÿÿ Zÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿíj glozelmap1ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ/Iÿÿÿÿÿglozelmap1.gifÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿþÿÿÿ…ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿð glozelmap3ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÛNÿÿÿÿÿglozelmap3.gifÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿþÿÿÿ#ôÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ)ä glozelmap2ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ°ÿÿÿÿÿglozelmap2.gifÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿþÿÿÿðØÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ½ glozelegyptÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿzbÿÿÿÿÿglozelegypt.gifÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿþÿÿÿ Qÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ¹ÿÿÿÿAlÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ¹¹ÿÿÿÿAlÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ¹¹ÿÿÿÿAlÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ¹¹ÿÿÿÿAlÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ¹¹ÿÿÿÿAlÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ¹¹ÿÿÿÿAlÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ¹¹ÿÿÿÿAlÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ¹¹ÿÿÿÿAlÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ¹¹ÿÿÿÿAlÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ¹¹ÿÿÿÿAlÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ¹¹ÿÿÿÿAlÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ¹¹ÿÿÿÿAlÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ¹¹ÿÿÿÿAlÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ¹¹ÿÿÿÿAlÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ¹¹ÿÿÿÿAlÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ¹¹ÿÿÿÿAlÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ¹¹ÿÿÿÿAlÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ¹¹ÿÿÿÿAlÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ¹¹ÿÿÿÿAlÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ¹¹ÿÿÿÿAlÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ¹¹ÿÿÿÿAlÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ¹¹ÿÿÿÿAlÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ¹¹ÿÿÿÿAlÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ¹¹ÿÿÿÿAlÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ¹¹ÿÿÿÿAlÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ¹¹ÿÿÿÿAlÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ¹¹ÿÿÿÿAlÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ¹¹ÿÿÿÿAlÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ¹¹ÿÿÿÿAlÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ¹ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿAlÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿAlÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿAlÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿAlÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿAlÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿAlÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ¹ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿGÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿdbÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿûÀ"Àÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ¬+ë+ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ Ž ŽÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿϹÏÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ•×Û×ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿég"gÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ/I/Iÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÛN)Nÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ°°ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ•×•×ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿzbzbÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ [no style]Times New Roman ÿÿÿ ƒ[no style intab]Times New Roman ÿÿÿƒ<$0a000000>Cover of book <%><$0a000005>Glozel tablet page 1 Book By Dean Clarke c. June 2002<%><$0a000006>Glozel page 2<%><$0a000007>Glozeltablet page3<%><$0a000008><$10000005><%><$0a000009>Cover of book <%><$0a00000a>Glozel tablet page 1<%><$0a00000b>Glozel page 2<%><$0a00000c>Glozeltablet page3<%><$0a000001> The Glozel Tablet of Vichy, France:<%><$0a000001> A Linguistic Study of the Oldest Known Tablet In the World<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> By Dean Clarke, BLS c. 2002<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>A Forward<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>In the Glozel Tablet decipherment various experiments were applied to see what this most ancient tablet was even referring to by subject. The first questions involved what alphabet did it use, or was it only a marking device of numbers or even of activities symbolically portrayed as looking like a alphabet or syllabic pictographic writing. I first used examples of Iberian and ancient Berber, which did help in cracking the middle period forms of this weird alphabet. Then I compared the closest symbol sign to these forms from a speculated variation of Azillian symbols dated at least 10,000 BC. This created a bed of language phonetics to work vaguely with. This language is supposed to be the oldest recognizable language in the world and so far known has never been successfully deciphered, until possibly now. First it must be stated the Glozel Tablet was found in Vichy, France in the early 1920’s AD and was latter tested as possibly being 10,000-12,000 years old, or 8,000-10,000 BC. The location of the find is the near dead center of higher southwestern France, or true center of the river basins. It was also one of the more northern migrations the Azillians would have followed the rivers to hunt frequent deer or other migrating animals. <%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>They would thus follow these migrating animals from Vichy, France toward the West Coast or go North to the Northern Coast of France. The Azillians were a culture of the lower portions of France and the coastal areas of Spain and had a mysterious arrival about 11,000 to 9,000 BC. They are presumed to come from Libya, and that is mostly based on certain symbols they wrote, and basic archaeology. The geometric form of writing was however not a over night process, yet it appears abruptly in Libya, and some parts of the southern parts of Egypt and Sudan. There are rare examples in Syria, Greece and Turkey but they have not been directly connected to the Azillians and only tentatively possible at best. This is where the mystery begins. It has been noted that they did have some affinities to the Magdalenian groups of Spain and France and cohabited with them yet brought a strange aspect of their culture on top of this earlier culture. They did share some symbols practiced by Magdalenians, but in a geometric writing sense they seem a little more exclusive or evolved. We could say Magdalenians evolved pictographic monosyllabic language, while the next stage the Azillians invited a more of a transition of dual syllabic forms based on one pictograph. This is where I start my endeavor.<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Sincerely, Dean Clarke BLS June, 2002<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>The Letters of the Glozel Tablet <%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>When the Glozel Tablet was first brought forward to John Cohane who wrote the book, ‘The Key’ he about pulled his hair out of his head over it. I have the luxury of not seeing this work to cloud the mind with those meandering which would have only given me more frustration so I must begin without prejudgment of scripts. The letters of the Glozel Tablet were then placed in the spots were they fell upon, and closely analyzed as to which direction they were to be read. On the Phaistos Disk found in Crete the letters were read as you turned it, this more true syllabic language was read as you turned it around. However, it also had one curvilinear line that indicated the reader to turn the script as a clue, with the Glozel this is not directly possible. It is a anthropomorphic animal or person depicted on it and so that can give a clue to what way to read it. If you turned the figure of the Glozel upright with the animal head up, you would suppose the writing is read from left to right or straight up and down. If you turned the animal or person on its knees facing to the ground you would read it again left to right or up and down. To read from right to left would be not hard but in narrative very difficult from a time and past time sense to the eye and the mind. Up and down would be easy but we have to remember what is going on in the geometric writing mind or progression, and what is going on in a linear order fashion. If you were to read geometry it would be read from a linear left to right direction for the most part, proportion has progressions and you would line it up to how you found it in its order. Now Egyptian script has been known to be read up and down and some Sumer writings as well, but this is very progressed compared to 8,000 BC thinking.<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Up and down is to save time reading, especially if the characters are intensive, left to right is actually sloppier and can be subject to shifts of symbol placement. I must point out when a Eskimo writes on a skin it is not up and down it is usually linear across the skin. The idea is event by event in a line like the moons, not up and down reading. When you write on skin you would write from the animals upper side to center to lower side, like the American Indian teepee can sometimes show as across read or around the teepee read left to right or right to left. If you were hunting this animal image you would go across the areas you wanted to exemplify your hitting it marks which a animal standing in a throw is across it when it moves not up and down it. In a sense if you miss the targeted animal here then if you time it right you catch the next best spot when it runs across the field of attack. Why would we not read it from the direction of the intention of this hunt, or linear wise? But if the Glozel was to be stood up, because it looks pregnant, and or looks to have breasts in a place a woman would have them, and she is sitting crossed legs like? Now if you draw symbols on a sitting woman how would a ancient mind write across it be that it was an animal or not in a stand upright position? You would read from not the front view right of the left facing pose, but the back body part of this view.<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>The taboo of not wanting your picture taken of your face would force you to read from the back of the head and leave little reading marks on the face. You would not read up and down as if checking out the Dolly Madison’s body too much, missing the point of the story. You would be forced to read it left to right from the Head top and then down to the lower body and not vice versa. I am sorry this took really way to long to explain and establish, but science is cruel so I took it to task. There is some evidence that this was a practice of reading a plate back to almost to Mesolithic times, but the evidence is scanty. Before true syllabic writing man wrote in what would be called more a monosyllables i.e. a consonant presented but based on the next symbol determined or consonant would give the first picture of potential vowels normally used. But before the mono syllables there was a language that fell between the cracks of Logo script and monosyllables. It was what I call both implied and written vowel systems. The reason is that vowels were not always standardized and the best example of the problem is the French Language vowels with many examples of vowel circumstances and varied uses. The French gave 6 circles of influence showing the use of vowels or consonants as Spheres of environment linguistic parameters.<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Here is an example of what this is like by the example below:<%><$0a000001> <$10000000><%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> Plato is thus leaving a clue that Atlantis is a language that used a vowel-based universe like the French used in ancient times. This would reflect Plato’s story about Atlantis concentric rings as a literary metaphor about their language, or the sea peoples language, as if the tower of Babel language problem. Plato is indirectly indicating the language of the French Basque culture was implicated by a vowel based universe from room to the universe as if outward from a river or a port. The main point is that the terraced regions of earth, room and city are the same sound of ‘A’ which made it difficult to distinguish this from the ‘ie’ sounds of the outer canals which means ‘Islands’ or Channels in Greek ironically, or AE, and ‘Ia’ terminals or prefixes. The use of the language coupled with consonants however as we get closer to Poseidon’s own house becomes vowel wise more so clarified. Therefore, French is not very far from Atlantis uses in vowel universes, of prepositions, or from interior to exterior meaning sense of how vowels accompanies the next dependent nouns particularly the spatial expressions in quality. Then it would not be hard to see it as found over long time periods by expression as well as in French Past indefinites, or conditional conjunctions, or imperfect subjunctives. This; however, will be discussed later, in ‘Time finished in present time" pun. We can conclude then that an Atlantean or French language involved a kind of vowel-based meter or haiku for a better way to describe it. <%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Ancient History and Vowel Locality.<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>It seems the vowel pattern at its height was strict do to directional or spatial instructions, or how something was by symbols first to be read, or the direction of reading them. At first consonants were viewed as not one directional but two directional in a way our notion of read a poem forwards and then read it backwards to see if the narrative is any good in meter. Why, do this if what is good or bad really matters? It might go back to the tower of Babel problem for it to was built on the principle of concentric vowel world rings, or concentric language principles viewed in either direction for the same meaning. This might remind one of the Welsh long town names problems, as just a little redundant, or circles in the word then circle it out? The down fall of spatial language is not the tower nor the rings, its downfall is that it did not allow for the conveyances of ideas in a true linear fashion i.e. to be more specific with an idea. There is no reason to not suppose that the language was in a symbolic form in the hands of a few at first. For it can become an inside code of a religion first, before the public could get hold of its pig Latin words which by that time was a stain glass window version of the story of that more mysteries based language. It thus was a language that in a symbolic form had rules only those playing with it understood its meaning and in fact knew what it meant. A geometry language is very much the key function of mystical symbols, and initiate languages. We do not think women were left out of its hints either. There is no doubt that both used in cult practices, but the men were the scribes of the trade. Women did not often carve work into rocks historically speaking, it was considered mans thing to do. But, no doubt it still did occur that women did. The script on the Glozel is written in a man’s hand, not a woman’s because the direction of the information seems to be about a mans point. Let us ask the reason why one writes in symbolic form to begin with? If you had a language like everybody else you would want to keep a secret in that language how would you do it? You wanted to hide a location of a seal rookery but only your friends were allowed in on the secret? Maybe you knew something about the weather and the stars and gave you an edge, but not for all to see? Symbolic petroglyphs, Hieroglyphs, abstract or numerical symbols would be your best bet, although word games would have been earlier then this in this glyphs into use. Babel is the running out of the secret, and having to form a new system. It would seem when Atlantis and Babel did fall the language went out to the countryside in order to escape the destruction of the anti-diluvian periods. A new view began to settle in about how to convey the Sea region that they were fishing in and the countryside model is what the Glozel Tablet is about. That is a slight modification of vowel order and replication yet still using the older system with in it of the 6 circles of the French vowel locality laws. The difference is that vowels were not now the clarification of the said objects, but only a pre-cursor of what the next line referred in time and space to based on the previous line. Before we attack the Tablet we should note that it is no longer considered by others or myself as a hoax, and that I have now found that the language is not a 13th Century Cahors Priests hiding caves work. The Cahor Monks were trying to escape the persecutions that do not fit in the language of these Glozel Tablet findings. If so the diction and the spelling show that next to no signs of modern encryption, instead it is a whole other system and commentary which I will for the first time reveal. The Cahors of France did not hide at Glozel-Vichy area, because they were held up mostly in a cave in the Ariege Valley called Les Eglises in Central Pyrennes Mountains. The name Glozel and Eglises are similar and actually do have two comparisons as to why they are similar. One is caves are not far from these regions and the second is the words refer to what is in French ‘icy’. ‘cold’, ‘deep’, and ‘glass’. The other similarity in linguistics is Vichy of Glozel had a La Vache and that is near Duruthy as a close made name. Vichy and Vache are an old name for a ‘cow’ and in some cases for ‘sheep’ in a herder’s linguistic economic language. It was in the La Vache the Proto-Azillians story begins of script writing of what should be labeled as a Mediterranean style of pictoglyphs. The date is now 8,000-10,000 BC and it is a fairly temperate period for mans wanderings around in almost sub-temperal tropic conditions. What is ironic about La Vache area Caves of Eglises is that the Glozel Tablet has a series of lines that are similar to the internal caves exit points. If the Cahors took refuge in les Eglises they might have well noted the exits and made them into a hieroglyphic script like the Glozel, yet why 100 miles northward was it found? This is however unlikely, for other reasons.<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>We need to explain first the outlines of time before we can use this in regards to the Glozel Tablet. The date of Glozel as I have said falls between 8,000-10,000 BC and found in France. We will also focus on the period of warming after the last worst Ice Age to see when this Tablet might have came about. Here is an example of the periods:<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Weather- Warmer-harsh humidity<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> 13,300-12,000 BC <%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Phase IV - Magdalenians are on the move after Bison, and are collecting<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> dolphin teeth and seashells.<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Weather-improves-still hot and humid<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>11,600 BC-10,600BC<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Phase V - Magdalenians begin to be invaded by a Mediterranean group<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> Or pre-Azillians.<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>10,500 BC <%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> wild grasses is being cultivated in the Oloron Region of <%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> the Bay of Biscay.<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> By this time Pre-Azillians intermingle with Magdalenians on <%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> more a local level. <%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Weather – still improving<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>10,800-9,500 BC <%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> Population doubles, an explosion of migration.<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> Proto-Azillians is about to begin, first Magdalenian symbols of<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> harpoon and fish found at Valon, France at Grotte Des Deux-Avens <%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> involves trout fish engravings.<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Prior to these circumstances around 13,000 BC the ice age was still being felt and the Magdalenians at Duruthy around the Pastou Cliff had settlements. Found at these locations were Lion and Bear teeth necklaces engraved with abstract designs, and those made them were following the trails of deer’s to the Central Western Coast of France, Atlantic Plains, and southeast a little beyond Narbonne. <%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>The History of the Bear-Cat Cults with Geometric Scripts. <%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>After the advent of the Azillians lime trees and hazel dotted the whole landscape and Le Marche was picked as a good place for food and temperate conditions. The culture earlier of the Noaillan had flint works and who primarily where hunters of reindeers of central Dordogne Valley of Vezere River in France. In a sense the Cro-Magnons or Magdalenians along with the Noaillans all moved into these regions in hunting toward the western Atlantic Plains of Central France in most cases after deer, bison, and bovine pig. Meanwhile, half of these people while waiting at some cliff edge played games on the ground, for hunting strategy, or for amusement of explanation as to what they were going to do that day, or in the past, or maybe even speculation of their future. At 20,000 BC a white disk of flint was made with 78 balls all found on the ground. One might say like marbles, or gambling of some kind. It could have been a bola net where the balls were weights strapped onto the net in order to catch fowl, or fish, which in some cases are still used to this day. However, the selectivity of Bear Skull to be mounted on a kind of Bear Sphinx that Casteret found in France and thinking that hunting darts were thrown at this clay bear image or model in a cave dwelling is describing a form of symbolic thinking. It was found near the Village of Montespan, which had a stream of Houantou filling up the caves galleries with water which flowed underground. The Houantou in Basque means ‘Hontu’ or Hondu as ‘Western Horizon’ Stream. The word Hound, or Hund is for Dog in Germanic Celtic speech. With this information the stream therefore having with it a subterranean waterway through a cave implies ‘Western Horizon, or Western Underworld’. The Bear brings up the thought of the underworld of the Big Dipper stars setting like the bear below the horizon into the cave so to speak. The Horizon of that stream would be the Milky Way idea. Now the research with a dark glassy eye deepens with the meaning of Glozel, or Glozet as Glisse-et as ‘slipped’, or ‘fell’ like a person or object would do. If the star we say was the star lost like the Pleiades, or Ursa Major stars we would be not a bit surprised in a seasonal sense or proportional sense as noticed by man near 20,000 BC marks. What most people do not know is that within the Houantou stream name is an ancient hidden form of the Basque name of a Bear as Otto, or Audu. Like the French word Haute for ‘big’, ‘large’, and ‘ upper’ the bear was associated with streams were it hunted once, and where later its stars christened the night sky overhead. We ask the question could both a models of a bear, and a star speared or to be harpooned in ancient possibility, or metaphor? The Egyptians later show it as so. What of the cat or feline they hunted in France was she significant enough as to be another dangerous creature guarding the caves like the bears does? We must remember men preferred hunting bear cubs, and Saber Tooth Tiger kittens over hunting the larger mothers or fathers of these creatures. This explains why the Little Dipper was so important as well to a cub and kitten hunter, and the little cats later to be called Bastet, or Bes, or Bas were equally so. The evidence of the Mesolithic influence upon Egypt of cats and bear cub hunters is shown by the names found in France itself. The evidence is that at Duruthy in the Pyrennes had a cliff named after an ancient cat cult, called Pastou, Bastu, or like Bast of Egypt’s cat goddess. We did note earlier the bear and cat necklace combined and to wit bast almost always wore a necklace, even some depiction in Egyptian art shows a bear with a necklace? When we go northward to the Dordogne River valley of the Vezere River a Laugerie Basse appears with a Laugerie Haute. Note that the Basse, or in French ‘Base, or Lower’ and Haute in French as ‘Upper, or Higher’ are seen side by side in a stream area. But what if really it is the Bas-Cat and the Haute’s of a bear and or their haunts? This is the same linguistic problem as the Glisse et words of Glozel because one could go so far as to say Eau Glacee, and like the Ohio’s Auglaize River for ‘cold stream’ names and not for other meanings or descriptions though they indeed are French? Yet in Basque it would really refer to a term for something ‘Icy’ then just cold as far as a regional explanation not just a specific one. The references of something ‘Icy’ can just as well describe an Ice Age that once occurred in a remote time. The Ice Age was well known in the Bay of Biscay. Duruthy next to Pastou Cliff shows at once the Uruthy, or Urtho type bear name next to a cat name of Bastou Cliff. There are many images in prehistoric art of the battle between the cat and the bear in front of a wall or a cave as symbolizing later inter-tribal wars. The Mycenians and Egyptians artifacts show this same repeating pattern of bear and cat wars or engagements. Ironically in Egypt to hunt a bear you would have to go a great distance from Egypt to get one. This would be a major excursion on the part of an Egyptian Pharaoh to go hunt a bear, and so we ask the question where? France would be one place, regions above Yugoslavia as well. Yet the rumor has it there were the Bears of Sierra Leona of Western African coast. It would seem in the end Bast overtook the Bear and not vice versa in religion later in mans history. But the Saber Tooth Tiger became extinct before the Great bear did in physical and for symbolic reasons. Duruthy also signifies the interest in horses towards the end of the Ice Ages. Even Dordogne shows the Duruthy name again within it, which in both cases Horses frequented those streams in ancient times. However, by the time the Azillians were crawling from the Coast of the Mediterranean and the Northern Spain some of these creatures were nearly extinct, or were extinct. Also by this time fishing and deer hunting was the two main pre-occupations as man does to this day in that now leisure sport. So, in general the abstract aspect of the symbols to the Big Cat versus the Big Bear became just a name in those extinct varieties, and by then not a hunting game specifically sought after due to depletion in those areas of those creatures by the arrival of the Azillians. Before I proceed on about the cracked Glozel Tablet a few hindsight summaries and information has to be considered. In Castillo Cave of great importance was found a cross of red ochre outlined within a crossing rectangle shaped building inside the cross symbol appeared. Castillo we know is a name far and wide well known, but which came first castillo the name for a fort or the habitation style of a building. When was a Castle a fort or a village. It appears the answer in this case is almost neither, but the best bet is on the name first then the enclosure or architecture secondly. Kaster of Kaster and Pollex as our Gemini twins show up this early in the twin rectangles of a fort or enclosure. They are crossed i.e. Twin habitations as one in a ‘X’ or ‘KS’ symbolism and we could say a ‘KS’+’Tor’ or Hill. It is said of Castor and Pollex like the roman story of their version had to go into a circle around the plain that to until they had ploughed the region they wanted for any village. The circle is only implied around this Castillo Cave’s ‘X’ by the circumference study and it means before the axis was marked of this Azillian town a radius was made out first! Not vice versa. All Azillian hieroglyphs have an actual circle with a ‘X’ in the middle, which is our oldest symbol of earth. Remember, wild grasses were cultivated in Western France at about 10,000 BC so, a settlement would ensue. This also brings to mind Plato’s concentric rings of Atlantis, which also had a cross through the middle of it. The symbol as to why Atlas is depicted as carrying the circle cross on his back and spreading the culture yet never could weaken in order to not tip the earth axis in the wrong direction. We will note the Gemini axis in this regard, and the Pole Bear as well. We must remember Atlas like his brothers Castor and Pollex are also all twin kingdoms, twin brothers, and twin pillars or crosses i.e. twins combined under one houses circle. How do we reckon this in regards to pairing two bears or two lions, and cats in art opposing each other. Are we looking at the facing forms of heraldry? It does not appear that the Azillians of the Mediterranean were known as Dual Bear or Dual cats but might have made a distinction between these to forces of nature dualistic but yet different like the clans they later meet in France. Example is in England it is the Dragon and the Cat as in China, and in some places the Bear and Cat were the symbols. Yet, just before these there was twin ibex’s of the Basque or bison’s in dual form. As you can see it is an iconography nightmare to sort out. The main theme however that runs through the whole theme is competition for the females or land i.e. sex and economy which has not changed much over the thousands of years. The other point is that whatever were the symbols the Azillians used had already begun to simplify through picture markings as a fast notation of these icons into a more geometric form. This seems to parallel producing grain and netting of animals as a progression in the art being as early as 11,000 BC in France. The life style was not a lot different from Egypt’s of this same period. Yet the Azillians had something few Egyptians had, a more complicated writing system based on an addition of early consonants. If we look at where the Azillians first enter they follow the coastline and not for just deer. They are like the North Coastal Africa groups of fisherman, catching fowl, eating grasses, and stalking otters, and mussel shell. They occasionally went after Hippo or seal animals and possibly even old-beached whales. We do find of this time harpoon large enough to take on whales in a boat or out rigger. Returning to the Red Crosses at that Castillo Cave, we now see that it is on a White Wall. The oldest name in fact of a suburb of Memphis or Cairo’s old name i.e. ‘White Wall’. Cairo was referred to in Egypt as the great racetrack, which once existed there, where horses raced around it. Marking thus the Twin Worship race, the Milky Way racetrack and the race of the domesticated horses and Atlantis racecourse. Why all of these issues from just a France Cave wall art? The white of the wall implies the importance of the stone in color, or object. Kes-Tr is in Egyptian ‘Stone Wall’ and so we can see the idea of a stone wall buildings are not just for an idea lurking around the Azillians Castillo Kaster connection’s? Cities are being built at 10,000 BC like the one of Jericho of the Mediterranean East. There is no reason to think that the walls were of just stone or wood by itself in the making of the fortress homes. Just that idea was already known. So here is the list so far:<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>House-Forts<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Harpoon-Fish <%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Geometric ‘X’s<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Twin associations<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Cat, Bear, Bison, Ibex’s and Deer<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Concentric circle with ‘X’s<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Head and thigh drawings<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Tents and Enclosures<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Purposeful Cultivation of Grasses (symbol appears)<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>More waterfowl pictures<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Here we can see a language has already formed by the activities that over and over are being marked on all sorts of objects. Art begins to stiffen like the Egyptian Art as well did. <%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>The stiffening of Art is a by-product of also stiffening of consonants, and linguistic rules. In some cases stiffening more than the Eskimo today. Not as stiff as Greek or Latin but about half as stiff as Egyptian. The play of the language however is ritually only in the sense of vowels from a dying art which may have proceeded by several thousands of years earlier. However, the Azillians are different they arrange the consonants to impose order onto the vowels and not vice versa. They mark the stage when the consonant must be clarified at the beginning of a word or well clarified if put in the middle and only imply terminals ends of a word without the symbol. This means vowels on the end especially are enhances to a sentence as we do find at times in French. There is two places I would like the reader to note of Azillian early starting points one is the Aude River Basin and the other is Fontantet both of which are the ancient territorial home of the Tarascon peoples, or home of the Western pre Phoenicians. We also must note that as the weather got more comfortable northwards in France the Azillians move northward and at times taking the old Magdalenian cave sites. Baring this all in terms of issues in mind the outline of what I propose is in this order of Discovery:<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>I. Comparison of Iberian, Berber, Etruscan, Ancient Greek and <%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> Azillian by language, consonant, or vowels.<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>II. The decipherment based on the median range of both symbols <%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> and pronunciation. <%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>III. Vowel and Spatial dimensions of language that lie in <%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> between form and pre-position styles based on modern <%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> French and Ancient Berber.<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>IV. The places or names referred to in the tablet of locality type<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> dimensions.<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>V. The meaning of the dimensions combined with the other <%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> summarizes.<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>The Layout of the Script in words and consonants or vowels.<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>The first thing I had to plot out was a chart map of the different languages which I used Ventris system slightly modified with not the detail of all variations of symbols as pre-positions. The reason is this is the only Table, and I am aware of no other example at my disposal so I had to narrow the field to consonants and vowels strictly. A series of maps will pinpoint for the reader to review both the linguistic layout and the geographical nature of the tablet information. You might say that this is the hard part of cracking a code. We will for now not venture the concentric circle or the onion of vowels, but more clearly plot out the syllabic process. The words or syllable consonants were plotted across a board much like the simple devise Ventris used on linear A. The difference is that this is a language that is 10,000 years older, so some deviations are more likely to be encountered. However, within the words at the most over 8,000 years any one consonant may have changed in a way at least 4 times. Say like ‘g’ to ‘k’, ‘k’ to ‘g’, ‘k’ to ‘gh’ or the reverse. One could say it is still a ‘ghw’ sound in pronunciation. The next thing is vowels, which are more stable, but have notation fluctuations say from AE to Ea or Oe to Eo. But if the median is used in 3-5 ancient languages compared a general idea of what the vowel sounded like at some point or time is possible to reproduce. The Iberians and Berber I made sure were 2,000 BC on back so as to only have 6,000 years to account for. This would equal 3 changes on any one syllabic consonant spelling. In a sense can go from ‘K’ to ‘G’ to ‘Gh’. In a vowel maybe only twice so as ‘AO’ could be ‘OA’ and back again to ‘AO’. The problem isn’t if they are correct or not but if they had a valid combination plausible in either Iberian or Berber as well as both languages. It is to be seen if this is the case because I am not a scholar of these languages. First the reader will see the map of the Glozel Tablet, then the alphabet-vowel associated with it next. The accuracy is about 80% at best, if lucky maybe 90% accurate. <%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>The Actual Tablet and Alphabet Mapping.<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>This is the actual outline and appears to be read left to right, but also can be almost read left to right from both the top and bottom sections still getting a similar meaning. In a sense it is almost bi-directional from top reading left to right across sown to bottom and reading the bottom from left to right towards the top. The reason it is mostly left to right is because the person who wrote it was right handed, and that the marks at the bottom forced the maker of the tablet to turn it to the left not the right. This would imply the way he writes generally and would be the way he reads. Thank Goodness, it was written in a circle slightly, but is it?<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001><$10000001> <%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> The next image is the actual alphabet of some 5 to 6 different languages based on Mediterranean Eastern and Western influences, most of which it is Spanish, Berber, and North African languages compared to Azillian, which afterwards I compare with Ancient Greek for a final conclusion. The reasoning was that the Etruscans, Phoenicians, and Ancient Greeks were known to trade with Morocco, and Spain which would be no reason to not think lurking underneath it is a arcane language of traders from 6,000 BC. As I have said I based the layout on the Ventris basic idea of phonetic mapping. <%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001><$10000002><%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>The next information is the actual script isolated in the closest English form.<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> I will now show the inscription words and vowels before any conclusion of meaning.<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> The inscription is as follows:<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> KHDHZ (S)<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> AQUA T (TH) AUTHOA<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> KWTHAU<%><$0a000001> AUTH N-(O) UATHAO<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> KHS TR<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> N-(O)<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> KHDHZ (S)<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> GWAO QUE N-(O)- S<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> N-(O) GWTH AO EA<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> N-(O) N(O) EA AO<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> As you can see KHDHZ is repeated twice, and KWTHAU and GWTH AOEA are very similar yet different if the cipher is correct. We also can see AQUA-T-AUTHOA is what is different from GWAO QUE N-(O)-S, or is it? Both AQUA_T and AOQUE-N are similar and show something that is like the difference between gender, or by some determined meaning of its variation. Note that the N-(O)’s are not started till after the KWTHAU which are sentence clarifiers and additives. In a sense the difference or comparison does not begin on the first three lines. The next issue is using our median found in Iberian, Berber, and Azillian vowels I used the French as comparison vowels not apparent in the other systems. Also ‘A’ or ‘AE’ sound almost always preceded the start of a word and rarely ‘UA’ or "WA’ without a consonant or a higher ‘A’ sound. It seemed all right to put at the end of the word a ‘UA’, or middle but at the end rarely. The end either had a consonant of ‘A’, ‘E’, or ‘O’ but not of the ‘wau’ form. This is also found to be true in peculiar French expressions and vowel placement as having the significance to how a sentence should be read. An example would be in French ‘One, somewhere the in Hall’ when any who read it know it as ‘Somewhere in the Hall, one ‘, or ‘Somewhere in the one hall’. This shows the complexity of sorting vowel rules and would make most give up or fail at the decipherment. However, what I did notice is that 50 to 25% of the vowel rules in France still today apply to this tablet and here is why. Some French vowels have time tenses put in them, some have conditional tenses and others syllabic clarifiers. I will not put this tablet in the same order as nouns, verbs, predicates and the like because some verbs in this tablet are not true verbs in how they were used, and <%><$0a000001>some adjectives almost do not exist. Verbs on a minor scale are clear or are vowel enhanced in a way more so then even French systems. The Glozel Tablet vowels (in some case noun like) almost take up to 50 to 60% of the meaning yet within these 25% we would call modern true nouns with consonants. This may seem perplexing to the reader but bear in mind 10,000 years ago. The language is not stupid either, there are complexities I have never seen in a language before found in this Glozel Tablet. I can actually see why John Cohane had difficulty with it in decipherment. It would have also helped me to have modern Berber help but at the time of this report I also did not want any clouding of results of a local French version first, and then study the Berber equivalence latter. For the time being I have not resorted to going over why the actual symbols are and what they once were to represent, but I will give three clues why they formed the way they did. <%><$0a000001><$10000003><%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> The next issue is using the above median value found in Iberian, Berber, and Azillian vowels. I used French compared vowel system symbols to clarify any vowel pattern not apparent in the other systems. Here we can see the build up of vowels with no less than 13 forms, and in consonants no less than 11 forms. This is only showing what was written and in actual vowels of modern language 5 vowels are completely represented with almost one or two of them no longer exist in France or are extinct. No less than six ‘wa’ found in sounds and is not uncommon in pre-celtic speech. First similar symbols were found in North Africa and the Iberians took a percentage of them from the neighbors and other cave drawings, which they understood, or not what they meant. Second the geometric level of designs involves these categories: Weapons, dwellings, animal parts, or geographic locatives, or outlines. <%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> Which means they also had a geometric form of early hieroglyphic writing. The third geometric forms use designs found in modern alchemy, astrology, and stick counting designs like the Ogam script. The symbols thus represent in themselves not just Country sheep, but right angles, horizons, marker sticks, four cardinal points, setting sun position or moon’s, as well as using tree lines as auspicious markers. For all intensive purposes out of nowhere the Azillians were not spending time in just art they were calculating the days, months, stars, and the animals that correspond with them. They also appear to be people who would have no problem building massive stone structures or monuments if weather permitted. Yet, the caves outside of coastal megaliths are the only places we find them. Would it be not funny if we found megaliths lower in the Mediterranean and Atlantic Shelf’s that would say yes this is so?<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> Let us now take the vowel French system of the universe which we saw in Plato’s outline and see how these plot out with the Glozel Tablet?<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001><$10000004><%><$0a000001>We will see the city is broken up into a room or a house, which means the room, or house is a settlement literally itself or it is a place where it exists via water streams, or plains, or a cave. We can see that if we turn the vowel structure from a vertical into a horizontal position from figure A) we find it is a physical notation and perspective of a view of the horizon as a spiritual one in symbol. <%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> Here we see the Universe over top the Earth’s Horizon, then the Country stressed in Upper and House as the Lower one with the Cities spread out or bifrucated in a sense of a northern twin and the more southern one as well. What this means is Country and House like the name of a Country House is likened to the French ‘Chatau’ and perceived as co-equals. There is no distinction of a national country from a natural home and is more like looking at countryside likened to a homestead. Yet, the cities are divided as if two kingdoms or valleys, or a true home as opposed to a temporary home. The city is stressed more than the house and room, which are equal in number. However, the house and room are stressed in the upper tablet of Glozel for a more permanent explanation of a true city while the lower portion of the tablet it is referred to as a city house. What is clear is that the ‘room’ is the central object, which quickly talks about the City House more than the ‘House Room’ in the lower tablet of Glozel. What is also clear in the vowels is a fairly balanced system that says "This is a Country House and that is a City House" this being in regards to, "This is a City Room, and that is a Country Room". One is permanent and the other is temporary. It is the difference of a village dwelling as opposed to a cave dwelling. And this is marked by an over emphasis of the Universe Country, as a room in a city and as opposed to a ‘Universe City’ as a house on Earth. This seems to mark the period of Earth Houses over caves, but the language still views this as a general dwelling place accept one is of one kingdom and the other is of the other kingdom. This means the Glozel Tablet says, "Yes, I know the difference of communal life and that I know a crude form of provincial government based o<%><$0a000001>n twin cities!!!!" Is it not ironic in modern times we saw the same thing in global trade that we had to start establishing sister city projects, why not 10,000 Years ago or more? One of the Norths and one of the South is what the Glozel is saying in its vowel structure, or one permanent and the other one as temporary. This implies why the ‘X’s at Castillo is really all about the home above and the home below the earth i.e. Red Ochre on both as universally tied and migrated upon. It also then occurred to me the ‘High’ or "Haute" and the "Basse" or ‘Low’ problem in geography connected with the permanent and non-permanency of dwellings. I then thought could the Cat be the City and the Bear of the Cave? I then wondered if this was the beginning of the idea of cliff dwelling houses like the Hopi and Navaho ancestors had, but this being found in Spain and France as an Azillian development of making homes, or forts on cliffs? To put the house on the cliff is to see the elongating of the earth’s horizon, and thus also elongating the view of the rising or setting sun. This would have also been noted as the difference from how shadows hit by a higher elevated area with light on the effect of shadows and such being different then how the light hit at the base of a cliff. It must have been the preference of a city or a fort to be overlooking a cliff in France as opposed to a riverside settlement at this time. This may correspond to the advent of the naming of Castillo in ancient times and that cave with the strange fort with its ‘X’s. Azillians knew and developed this difference. In many respects their cosmogony would be very much like the ancient Haitians of Haiti who also had cliff dwellings, and were cave dwellers as well. The universal tree in this case is bending toward the room or<%><$0a000001> the city at the center as a golden bough, and this showed me that a waterway is being referred to twice as the difference from the city explanation. There is three aspects to decipherment on the Glozel Tablet words which themselves were discovered to be about. One question is what order do the Glozel Tablet symbols actually layout as? The second question is what forms of use to achieve the ancient and the modern comparisons in meaning and perspective? Last of all the locative, or object functions of the noun how was it so used? I will go through line for line every word and then compare the meanings. <%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Number Value Name or Glozel line word Meaning<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>(4) +10 Khdhz A city in Spain and in Egypt Qetas or ancient Cat-Goddess with two cats was revered in Spain, and Egypt at a remote time. Note the ‘e’ and the ‘a’ were interchangeable at front and back of word. Two lion Pillars of the Mycene in Greece and the goddesses connected with the Pillars like the Straits of Gibraltar once <%><$0a000001>were also called by cat names. City, room, and building associations by vowel. Khdhz is mentioned twice on tablet so it is city twice. DHZ means ‘knife’ in Egyptian so with ‘KH’ to cut may well be with a knife<%><$0a000001>T he next line on script further clarifies the use of ‘Couteau’ in French for ‘knife’ <%><$0a000001> (4) + 10 Aqua –T –Auth- OA A-Quatau shows the ‘Couteau’ word. ‘Water of Aude’? However, a universal comment seems to like Acqutin, or imply a region or river name in last part. Yucatan Aqua means water or river in Spanish. Ahaut- Egypt’s twin Deer The Celtic replaced Aqua with Eskau names of Goddesses. For water, with the ‘T’ as a connected transition for something like ‘of the’. The Haute name comes to mind for ‘Big’ or ‘Large’ water, but this overlooks a ‘Bear’ or a water beast like an otter. The earth-universe would be water but seems to be redundant as if one god displacing another older water god. Authoa is ‘water’ like the Egyptian ‘Iotr’, or ‘Yotr’ but just without the ‘R’ end which is only a implied by a lost vowel. Places like Egito or Acquito are reminiscent of Aquatauthoa said quickly. This language is very much like the Hottentots and in places of central Africa. The closest French equivalent is Rougeatre for red, and Eau Tiede or trepid waters. We know the Nile was once referred to as the Red and White kingdoms and rivers of the Nile branches not just Blue and White. <%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> 4 KWTHAU The Universal-Building sounding much like a cave name and Egyptian Qertu word<%><$0a000001> or for French ‘Grotto’. Also the knife name in French is ‘Couteau’ and a replication of <%><$0a000001> Kwthau as Gwth-aoea as ‘knife’ twice noted in the Glozel Tablet as a kind of ‘cleft’ of a<%><$0a000001> cave. So, one would think of a kind of directional comment would appear next due<%><$0a000001> to the city-cave-cleft progressively specific. Also ‘Water of ‘Aude or Adour'. <%><$0a000001>16 AUTH N-O UATH AO The significance of Uath or Auth twice is a 8 + 8 vowel difference and in French is likened ‘cave of summer’ to number ‘eight’. Hottentot name appears signified by numerical value of 8th Month in pronunciation but is only indirect. The ‘Auth’ word shows the ‘to the right’ type meaning, or direction. But, the ‘up river’ is often given in the replication form of Haute-n-Aathao’ or ‘ high water, or upper water’. <%><$0a000001> If we take the 4+16=20 of the Kwthau-Uath-Nouath the name of Cote Aud Nouth or Cote Du Nord of Finistere, France will appear in the tablets word.<%><$0a000001>KHST TR City is implied but this would be ‘cliff’ Two also (To) presented for the ‘TR’ as in Thea-tr-e Implies a or a place looking down upon a stage of a division of two cities river valley. Also, Castor name shows itself and bifurcation in the center as if the one who also gave Birth to the twin cities. KHS-T-TR is ‘stone factory’ with flint as the source not just a ‘Castle’ City. The ‘To’ clarification is ‘to Stone Works’ <%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> 4 + 10 numbers KHDHS-Z The second time it appears as if one returned (Diz) in French to it like a typewriter. The City, Room, and Building is the same or different in habitation since the top of Tablet is past tense reference meaning tense is consistent. Now comes the hardest part and most complicated part of the tablet.<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>15 GWAOGUE N-O-S Here do we break now ‘gwa’ of from the (J) ‘que-nos’, or do we look at one word.<%><$0a000001> What if it French ‘Somebody, Although’ is three syllables. If so it would be the oldest in ‘Now, we shall have there' or ‘Ice or Snow’ three syllables in the world. <%><$0a000001>4 NO GWITH AOEA Both ‘House and Universe were implied in the Knife of French above word and the ‘NO-GWITH-AOEA’ word. Couteau is implied and this is redirecting us to go back to the other in the pronunciation of ‘KWTHAU’ of the now viewed ‘Cave of Summer’. This Nogwithao is a winter retreat instead, or a ‘Cave of Winter’. This Gwithaoea is a universe house as a cave, but leading back to a city. The next lines reveal this to be the case. <%><$0a000001> 0 N-O Here many combinations were shown of (conjunctive) conjunctive over kills three times the ‘NO’<%><$0a000001> appears yet is likened to a prefix. Earlier ‘NO’was like ‘of the’ or ‘In’ language.<%><$0a000001>0 N-O EA AO (conjunctive) But later it is a addition or differentiation like with earlier- No Gwith Ao Ea ‘and, or’. Yet ‘is of’ cannot be ruled out as 'between two places’ a personal conjunctive. Here also<%><$0a000001> the ‘room like conjunctive ‘Neither nor, country’ is traded for ‘house-city’ because it nor either’ or ‘either or whether’ abruptly ends after the second Khdez name. Considered a conditional comment. This means it is a temporary place and they had on the previous line ‘que-nous’ Return to the Khdez above by name. Expressed by the ‘past indefinite’, or "Time finished in present time". <%><$0a000001>Here we see the previous line of the que-nous in French as expressions in a past as a conjunctive indefinite like either then or now (n-o) and between the two rivers or Khdhz’s. We then have the final condition.<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Azillian Glozel Tablet Imperfect Subjective Modern French( this is backwards)<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> KHDHZ CHANTASSIEZ<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> Qwao que no s Que Nous <%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>No Gwith aoea Il Douta<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>(Read tablet in two ways) Expressed by "Present time from a past Forward or Backwards stand point."<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> i.e. the meaning returning to past or ‘KHS-T-TR’ which in turn means returning to KHDHZ itself. In a sense<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> says, "We will return to the same said place that they started or finished i.e. the earlier KHDHZ-Top."<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Here a "past indefinite" with a backwards imperfect subjective or reversed imperfect subjective announcing with time that has finished "clarified" and the present time in <%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>A past stand point "clarified" defies linguistic evolution!!!!<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>An Explanation of Meaning, and the Layout of it.<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>The Language is as complex as aboriginal ‘dream-time’ is in Australian languages. It goes a step further for it is explaining ‘water’ or ‘river’ replications, cave replications and ‘stone’ in a ‘qautro’ or ‘quantrane’ in four times style. The stone made the culture, the cave made the settlement, and the river flowed above and below them. Yet, they refer to the whole account as being in two places at the same time. Only a place where two great rivers meet while watching over a cliff does one feel this expression of time or the effect of aboriginal "dream-time". We may note that in the upper tablet the water is ‘red’ and being a symbol of left, and the lower tablet the water is ‘black’ or ‘blue’ with the No Ea Ao word of Noi (r) a (r) in French. The conclusion is ‘Red’ flows to KHS-T-TR and the ‘Blue’ flows to KHS-T-TR, but the cipher key is that both lead to adjacent KHDHZ’s. WE might say there is a KHDHZ of the North, and a Cadiz of the South in possibly France itself and not just the other in Spain. One KHDHZ on one river and a KHDHZ on another is related in tablet. The clue is that the KHDHZ in the North was visited in the ‘Summer’ towards an area not far east of Cote’s Du Nord region or a little lower down from Chartes, France. Chartes may well be our KHDHZ of the North by name. The other was Gascogne in the winter. One may ask what time frame were these conditions so? It was not so really before 13,000 BC, and generally not so for the Azillians till a couple of thousand years later say in 11,000 BC. It is even more probable in KHDHZ being set up or established that would be at about 10,500 BC<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>As there starting point. The Glozel Tablet is probably between 10,000-8,000 BC for the conditions were perfect for this to occur. Before we go into more evidence to confirm this we may want to look at the distribution of the ‘key’ words in the words of the Glozel Tablet. <%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> GWTH AOEA (‘WAY’)<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> Wales Gwthu or Gwa<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> (cliffs, clefts, caves)<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> Spain KHDHZ (Cadiz)<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> (a city, village, settlement)<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> West Coast Africa Auth N- (O) Uath Ao<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> (Hottentot tribe, people, name of)<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> Ivory Coast Africa Gwaoque like Kwa-Qwa<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> (Tano tribe words)<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Also ancient Celtic of Northern Europe has Og, Oc, or Ackwa words as suffixes, prefixes, or terminals.<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>When we look at this we find the Azillians were invaders of the west, north, and coastal Africa and they at the same time were centered near Cadiz, Spain or south of it. Wales juts out like a strange aberration with pre-Celtic language having ancient Basque affinities and myths of lost lands before 4,000 BC to their west. France was hit by a language in someway foreign to her, but yet the Azillians assimilated rapidly into the fading Magdalenian cultures speech. The clue that glues Africa, Spain and Wales is ivory trade, which became the centers also for metal like gold, copper, and silver. Who the Azillians were is no more closely identified with Egyptians, or a true Mediterranean race, at least at first. They are a maritime culture exclusively beginning on the Atlantic seaboard and moving into the Mediterranean and not the other way around. It seems the Gaunches of the Canaries would have related to the Azillians very well in life style and may even benefited in some cultural context by contact with Azillians? It would not surprise me if the Gaunches had some affinities to the Glozel Tablet’s language or linguistics. Especially a name like ‘Aquinos’ or something sort of likened to it. Classics of Greece are right Okeanos, or Oceanus are of birth in the Atlantic Ocean’s heritage from the very beginning as evidenced by what the Glozel tablet conveys about the Azillian influences of Africa, Spain, and France. Even Ogygia is really not just an Ocean Giant God he is:<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> Gyguenos<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> Gwaoque-nos<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> Ogygia+Okeanos (earlier were combined)<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> Giaoqeanos<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>It seems our mystery has deepened even more then just word circles in the air. One of the other clues is the position of the Adour and the Aude Rivers of our earlier Auth N-O Uath Ao tablet word, which shows that Aude River was first by name. And the Uathao or Adour is second in relation to being kind of sister rivers with same names. There is a connection to the latter settlement of Addaura in Sicily below Italy town to these Odes in French. .<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>We now need to look at where these Glozel Tablet references lead us.<%><$0a000001>Over all these are a Country Side commentary and here is the ciphered code meanings-<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> Region of ‘Red’ River (note Aquat or Kwthau-Auth Nouath)<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> Cote Du Noud<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>KHDHZ City-Place (in the North) next line leads to a river or regional place.<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>AQUAT AUTH OA River of Audu-r, or Audeo next line refers to North in court or<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>‘To the Left’ Couthu names.<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>‘Water of the Bear’<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>‘River-at-High-Upper’<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>KWTHAU A place to stay at i.e. for shelter or collecting implements next <%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>(knife-cave) line refers to North more specifically.<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> Couteau-‘Knife’<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>AUTH N-O UATH AO The name surrounds Paris and Chartes (KHDHZ?) involves a <%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> ‘To the Right’ Staging area for summer camps as courts and forts or castle<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> ‘Cave of Summer’ names appear. <%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Like Authon names in <%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>France as summer month name<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Or a river name. (Bear-High-Upper)<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Transition- (mid-point represents were Glozel was placed at Vichy, France)<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>KHS-T-TR (original type)<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Knife-cleft Khst –Atre Exterior cliff overhang city of stone works Hill city ledge ‘to’ From form like Movement now changes towards the south.<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> Theatre.<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>N-O<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>(on-to)<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> Region of Black or Blue <%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> City-Place (in the south) next line leads to river or regional place.<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>KHDHZ <%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>(Cave of Winter)<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>GWAOQUE N-O-S (some-there we shall now have) -past indefinites modern French, or<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>(Somebody, although sometimes) "Time Finished in Present Time".<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>‘way-water’ (plural)-people or entrance found in the south mostly (a return home)<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> Oque-n-os (expression cold water)<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> Next line revealing this as Nogwthaoea as snow.<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>NOGWITHAOEA<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>(Cave –Knife) of winter (escape from)<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>N-O (on-to)<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>N-O EA AO (note the vowels are reversed from the previous Nogwith-(ao-ea))<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> Indicates ‘between two places’ like KHDHZ, GWAOQUE N-O-S, or<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> KHS-T-TR. The bottom of the Tablet refers to ‘returning back to again’<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> And the vowel reversal from the Nogwith (ao ea) may refer to the<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> Conditional comments for the bottom two lines like conjunctions of<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> ‘neither nor, or nor either’.<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>The bottom three lines after the last KHDHZ are imperfect subjective in modern French expressed by reverse of the modern form as being, ‘Present Time from a Past Standpoint". In French is Eauglacee, Chantassiez, Quenos, Il’ Douta. <%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Our final conclusion is something like this in meaning:<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Dez ‘means knife’ Kadez (city)<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>‘to the left’ Aquat Authoa or River of Bear, ‘Otho’ (upper)<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> Kwthau, or Cave-Knife encampment (northern cave of summer)<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>‘To the right’ Auth N-O Uathao ‘at another turn’ Bear Summer River <%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> like the Somme (region of caves, Khs-t-tr’s, flint)<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> Khs-t-tr or ‘knife-hill’ ‘to ledge’ (a city of stone works)<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> N-O onto<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> Dez meaning ‘knife’ Kadez (city)<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> Sometimes, some people’ Gwaoque N-O-S ‘we shall now have had’<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> Way of water entrance ‘icy or snow’<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> i.e. winter.<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>‘Descend to’ Nogwith Ao Ea <%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> (cave-knife)<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> N-O onto<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> N-O Ea Ao returning to the Nogwithaoea and then Kwthau <%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> Auth N-O Uathao. The crisscrossed vowels mean back to KHS-T-TR.<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Conclusion-<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>City of Kadez (North)<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>To the left of river of bear<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Cave knife camp<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>To the right at another turn<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Bear’s (summer river)<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Knife hill (place) to the ledge or Khs-t-tr<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>(then) onto Kadez (South)<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>(sometimes at) Gwaoque n-o-s ( we shall now have had winter-as ending)<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Water-Way entrances<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>(a stay at) Nogwithaoea, or cave-knife (of winter)<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>(then) onto (from between the two places)<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>N-O Ea Ao i.e.’either or gwaoquen-o-s, or Kadez of the North.<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>We see the Glozel Tablet is an Azillian instruction guide to places in France. The place names may if we are still lucky be found to exist and explain for why they are present where they are in regards to Kadez, Coutou, or Caves and Flint in the area, Bear streams, or the rivers with Otto and his caves. Lastly the names of Khaster or Castel are more then just cave-forts of Rock but of early cities and flint works being plotted out. Also, the Gwaoquenos names as a indigenous or migrated words into the region o France place names seem to mean a kind of ‘water’ people who were well aware of domestication of cow and sheep. We would have to plot out the caves in line with flint, and including the settlements of the Azillians brought into mind the names of Bear Gods, or their rivers and the proximity of the Basque like Cadez names. It will be noted that the absolute center of all the names involved in a north and south and east and west direction fall just east of Glozel area of Vichy, France at 46’ latitude center. This means the tablet was found where it was commemorative wise the most useful to the Azillian travelers seasonally migrating from settlement to settlement in the form of caves, tents, rock outcrops, settlements and herding or hunting regions. In first map you will see the actual distribution of the place names, an in the next map you will see the plotted results to the nearest identification of the Glozel Tablet words in regards to the absolute centers of places with Glozel Tablet word. In that last map you will see the actual specualted route the tablet is literally addressing compared then with a map of the pilgrimages of the St. James routes of Compostella’s Gypsies in France and Spain. This was overlayed to the site I found based of Glozel Tablets inscription<%><$0a000001>s as a route for hunting and seasonal migrations likened to spring pilgrimages of France upto recent times and back to 9,000 years ago. Before we go onto these points or maps we may want to look at any Etruscan examples of this tablet type of language to see if Etruscan has a prehistoric residue?<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Ancient Greeks and the Etruscans, do they barrow from Azillians?<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> This is an example of early Greek of 800 BC compared with the Glozel tablet found in Vichey France in 1920’s. It is the closest Iberian and Berber symbolic pronunciation combined with the Greek equivalence. The only difference being that instead of Celtinized ‘W’s<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>and in ancient Greek they are ‘U’s. The older form of ‘W’ would have proceeded in sound before the ‘U’ by itself. The basic aspect is that either way they produced a similar sound between ‘U’s and ‘W’s after a ‘g’, ‘k’, or a ‘q’ sound especially. The ‘ae’ or ‘ea’s later in Greek for Islands are noted at the end of the message which do not appear above or in most of the tablet. They occur only 2 to 3 times. Which usually has a declarative of a ‘AO’ sound which is like French ‘Aux’ later. In which case it is usually assigned to a ‘fair place’. ‘Fair Isles’ is indirectly indicated or ‘of them’. The amount of no’s in between them indicate no twice to three times as ‘No fair place, no Island or not good place.’ This would be deceiving because the message is in a past tense to refer back to the messages above in a future stance. In a sense the lands are good in one season not good to be in when in a bad season occurs. Here is the Greek adapted type-<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>K D H S Z<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> K D H S Z <%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>AO GUT AU TH O A<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>AO G U T AU T H O A <%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>K U TH AU <%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>K U T H A U <%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>UA TH N O UA TH AO<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>U A T H N O U A T H A O <%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>K H S T R<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>K H S T R <%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>K H D H Z<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> K H D H Z <%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>GU AO QUE N O S<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>G U AO Q U E N O S <%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>N O GU TH AO EA<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>N O GU T H A O EA<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>NO NO EA AO <%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>N O NO EA AO<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>By looking at the fact that 11 out of 8 pictographs are extremely similar between the Glozel Tablet symbols and the Ancient Greek we see that there was some adaptations occurring linguistically and symbol wise. Half of the Glozel Tablet symbols so far to my knowledge no known Greek equivalent for those other symbols. This means that only half of the symbols were officially retained by 800 BC and even then the Greeks changed slightly the other similar half’s symbols that they kept. The change is not dramatic but does show the erosion of those symbols by 2,000 years. The original Greek alphabet before 800 BC, though it be in part almost hieroglyphic by nature, must have had a certain portion of an even older geometric hieroglyphic form as compared to the Glozel Tablet that is found. We find the geometric form has some ancient Crete glyphs but they fall under the category of Pelasges type geometric forms. So, it would seem that the Greek geometric writing was in part borrowed from a pre-Phoenician culture such as found in Syria, Ionia, Cyprus, and Northern Greece. The date of 2,800 BC is at least the original date of this kind of Greek writing of ‘Ancient Greek’. It is often assumed that they merely stylized the Cretan formula; but this is now in question, it would seem Libya had more to do with this pre-Phoenician appearance then Crete? In which case this would mean that Sicily would be of central importance in this question around 3,000 BC. If Libya brought the script type then one has to ask why that aspect of Berber did not over take in full all of the geometric aspects of the alphabet and only half of them to Greece? We may conclude that it is more erosion from an older culture that already had those forms of pictographic writing and that other cultures displaced the <%><$0a000001>ancient Greek alphabet symbols into the effect of breaking down in thirds of the whole alphabet each thousand or couple thousand years. If this were the case, all the Egyptians and Libyan’s did by trade was reinforce the other half to in a way become retained or remain. The Cretans must have helped Greece drop a third of their geometric symbols by 2,000 BC, and replaced a portion of Greek paleo-language into their own geometric writing short hand probably helped by the Phoenicians around the same time. So if we take the date of 3,000 BC, the other third of the geometric symbols before this time had been lost would then constitute a period 2,000 years previous at the least and now we are at a 5,000 BC date. This falls in a date when the Basques and Armenian migrations were occurring through Syria, Egypt, Libya, North Africa, and into Spain by either trade or conquest. It falls between 6,000-,5000 BC this migration and means that by trade a re-assertion of the ancient geometric writing would have taken place in Greece at this time and this may explain the ‘uthao’ or autho words in Greece as Caucasian-Basque like remained longer then other areas. But the Greeks must have had half their language in an older form then the period of this migration because they only changed a small portion of their language to accommodate this process. The other third of the symbols the Greeks lost at 5,000 BC was the replacement of the newer form of the same symbols. This means that another 2,000-3,000 years back the more pure form of writing was kept. Which puts the Greeks having this form of writing like the pre-Phoenicians and the ancient Berber-Iberians at ,7000 to 9,000 BC which fits very well in the model of the movements of the Azillian Language and geometric writings. It would seem tha<%><$0a000001>t this means the Glozel Tablet was formed at the latest 6,000 BC and at the earliest at about 10,000 BC. The Greek version seems to indicate that about 8,500 BC they used this writing like the Glozel Tablet, and would seem to indicate they spoke a language similar to the Armenians and Berber type Basques languages of this time. This if being the case would make Syria, Cyprus, Egypt, Italy and Sicily a prime target of transferring of this type of writing, with Italy and Libya as the center point. The Glozel tablet appears to be a 9,500 BC language written in 8,000 BC pictographs. They seem to be a post flood form of writing, and the earliest so far known or available to the public. The Azillian writing appears to be a cross between Berber and Paleolithic Greek, while the idioms are Basque and Pre-Phoencian. If on a map we crossed these regional areas we would cross right over Sicily roughly as the center, with Malta, Southern Italy and the Tyrrhenian-Ionian Seas. The reason we do not find more of these kinds of markings is because the lands in those regions went underwater9,000 to 6,000 years ago. This does not however explain this kind of writing in regards to its origins. One thing is certain the Azillian Language is closest akin to Berber, and indicates originally a fisherman’s tool kit, and megalithic masons surveying ability. <%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>An Pre-Egyptians analysis of the Glozel Tablet<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Lets take this a step further what of the Egyptians making a similar set of images or words?<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>There is the word Qet, or Qet-t, which is like the lower form of ‘Khstr’ and Khdhs on the Glozel, tablet in Egyptian hieroglyphs. The actual Egyptian derivation would have the form of sttchuh, sttuh, and in another form of kttchuh, and kttuh, or kdtuh. The ‘s’ would appear on the end, but the hieroglyphic of the starting ‘s’ had been replaced the ‘k’ or ‘c’ sound. We have to look at both to see the resemblance of the lost language:<%><$0a000001><$1000000a> <%><$0a000001>Sa – to wander, or shrine that housed a god, or goddess<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Sau – to pass<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Sah- Orion star and constellation, spirit body of man<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Saha Tet – festival of Osiris pillar<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Saiti- Watchman, Guard<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> Sehetu- Sky of Tuat aakhu-t shetuat – hidden door<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Seshet- Circle like a Star, a bandlet (Horizon)<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Seherit-tu – Goddess of third hour of night Sehetchut- Light Rays<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>This shows us that in Egyptian the first line of hieroglyphs of sttchuh is built up with a story about Orion, Set, and Seshet the Orion’s consort goddess. It is also about a shrine and a city by those names of Sah or Sesh. Also a hidden door, a Circle of wandering stars, and the sky of Tuat in a region not far from Orion’s own constellation as a dividing point of the northern and southern hemispheres of the night sky. We now will look further into the meanings:<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Sesh- Drawing of the door bolts of the door, a passage<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Sesha- To pass<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Seshua- To praise or S-uash- to praise, to stab, away<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Sesh qetut- Drawer of pictures<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Here we see a passage through door bolts, praising, and moving toward<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>the light of the door by the soul or person. The stab, with the drawing of pictures seems to invoke sympathetic magic in order to reach a goal found in these words. They would be shooting of a spear or an arrow at certain points of an animal’s body, or its horizon movements. And marking the journey of the daily and nightly sun as some how similar. We see this in connection with Plato’s Atlantis when before a law was passed down a bull or a bear would be tied to a pole and only attacked with sinews and spears, no arrows were allowed. This brings to mind also Orion who is depicted as both spearing and hold by a chain a bear, bull, or a pig as a continuance of divine justice. This sympathetic magic act ties in with Orion’s, the Sun’s and the some animal’s passages in the sky or on earth. The ancient Azillian’s fascination is that Orion was a great hunter maintaining the poles of the sky in their divisions. He is in a sense their equator pole god in itself. Orion is elaborated upon these Egyptian terms:<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> Seh en Utcha - court justice<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> Seh – pull cord, net<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> Sneh- like sinew to bind with<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> Snekhtt- to strengthen, the bind<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> Sepeh- to lasso, at the hind leg<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Orion also had northern enemy named Set whose kingdom kept leaning in on Orions:<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> Setesh- Set God<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> Setchtui- Sets or Orions Archers<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> Setchetu- Description, narrative, or story of something<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> Satah- Field of 10,000 cubits, also a mythological serpent, Set’s name in <%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> A Apep form.<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>S-thes- to unite, to unravel, solve a difficulty<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Set-t – a summer house<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Sat- a shelter, grave or a wall<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Here we see the battle ground upon 10,000 cubits, between the serpent, Set, with archers involved in a battle, or the arrow Orion hunted with. We also see that it is a mythic story, and that it was a difficult trial for Orion to unite the sky and to unite against his enemies on earth. It would seem his court might have been 10,000 cubits, which led to a solution to the night sky problem. The point is that the story was written in variety of modes on papyrus, on stone engravings, and on other artifacts as a very important Egyptian story. Seshet was to the Egyptians the Goddess of writing and sculpture who is second only to Thoth, or Anubis in the credit of teaching of written word:<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> Sesh qetut- Drawer of pictures<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> Setchetu- Description, narrative, and story written<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> Saquiti- Sculptor<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Another variation of the words of passing, away, or passages we see that the ‘sttu’ is prevalent and a transition of Setchets own name:<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> Stu-t – make a copy, or image, to symbolize<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> Sutet- to walk, to journey, a traveler<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Here we see her story was put together by more a travelers knowledge of various symbols which she picked up along the way. There are indications she was from Libya, and was closely tied to Neith in Egyptian history as a huntress due to the fact she wore a lions cloth dress, and at times symbolized with arrows crossing. There is also some vague indication that Seshtchet was really a variation of Qetesh the foreign Egyptian Goddess of the twin lion cats. The combination of the two would remind us of the goddess Astroath in certain forms. The connection of Qetesh and Seshtchet is that they both studied astronomy and this is why we have to look at the Glozel Tablets closer Egyptian derivation in the Qett, Kttu, and Kttchu forms. We being with the study of an image, copy of image, art, or sculpture of Qeti:<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> Kha- a cord, used for measure<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> Kha- To carve<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> Khat- engraved<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> Kha-t- a bandlet or headband<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> Khett- cut reeds, writing as well<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> Khe-t – literature<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> Khet-t – engraved in stone, or sculpture<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> Kheti- engraved<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> Qeh- Naos, shrine, a bolt of a door, flint, and artists<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> Qet- To make pictures of likeness<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> Qet-t – a circle<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Here we see the kit used by a earlier writer of stone, sculpture, pictures, writing with reeds, stone tools, cords, and flint implements. We can see a geometric aspect to circle making, lines with cords, copying other things images, and a shrine implicated.<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>It must be explained although an argument on the converting K’s into Q’s might be dangerous the reader will find that historically they are similar in use of c’, k’, and g’ sounds. Especially based on consistent meanings:<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Gui- Altar<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Qah- Bend of a River<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Khau-t- To shine, crown, and ring<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Khatt- a grave<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Khut – a magic charm, or house<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Kheb-t – a cave<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Khebs-ta – Ceremony of digging up of the earth festival<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Here we see that the ring, or bend, and crown are connected with shapes of rivers, graves, caves, houses, and altars. Which marked a culture anciently fascinated with circles as protection symbols like the yoni of the Ankh. The festival of the digging up of the earth is one of the most ancient Egyptians festivals known. It may well be a circle, or ova were also implied in layout of early agricultural sites by rivers and high points above rivers. It is natural to assume those old caves and old fishing grounds would constitute the reasons of these early layouts and in light of curvilinear words. To prove this we look at the amount of words using Qat, Ket, Khat, Khit terms to see that they were a terrestrial compliment to the art they copied:<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Qa-t – High Land, Buildings<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Qeti- a river that bends south, as is would north as well<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Khaa- To leave<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Kha-Ta - Farmlands<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Khet- To go north<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Khet- To into a land<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Khe-t – Hall, Chamber, Fort, and similar to a term for a cave Qetu<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Khett- a stream<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Khet- Terrace with trees<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Khet- Stairs of the Judgement of Osiris<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Khetta – To wander about, through a land or domain<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Khentchu- terraces, rising gardens<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Khetui- Reapers of grain<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Her we see rivers, and land being traveled to certain points of gardens, terraces of trees, or plants, caves, forts, and stairways to these sites. We also can see directional confusion with Qeti as a stream going south and the northern one Khet. This is because at one time there was for the Nile two river goddesses one for the north and other for the south who had Khetti, or Qetti sister names as if twins. We might even call them the Getti twin sisters. This might explain Qetes goddess’s two cats who were the Gatti’s? Lets see if there is any religious substance to this:<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Qata- The Goddess who opened the gates up for Ra.<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Kaskh-t – Hill of the Spirit Bodies, also names of kings.<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Khat- House of Stars<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Kha Sti-t – Crown of the Land of the Bow, like Neith’s symbol<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Khait- a Goddess<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Khaitiu- Gods who killed enemies of Ra and Osiris<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Khaut- Skin Hides<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Khi-t - Sky Goddess<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Khestetch- lion-cloth<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Khut-Tchet-f – Body shines, a certain metal prepared.<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Here we see the Khatti, or Gatta with their Neith like Sky Goddess and here land of the bows, or tribal archers fighting celestial and terrestrial battles. The fact that lion cloth as literal lion’s cloth with skin hides of some animal signifies even more so the Seshshet, and Qetes identities. We see the Gates or hills she is in charge of domain wise. We do not have confirmation that the ancient aspect of this is from Azillian influences, nor evidence of copper being used, but the beating of some metal into a shape is so far to be likely known in the Azillian period roughly 8,000 BC. We come to the reason that the word being formed near caves may well have had some fishing association with these terms:<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Qahu- tanks were fish were kept<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Khaut – a Fisherman<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Khetu- a bird or Fish<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>Khutchu- a fisher of Khetch- or fish<%><$0a000001> <%><$0a000001>As we can see our modern word of ‘catch’ literally means to Ketch a fish, which Ketch means fish itself at first. The Khaut or Qahu-t terms were born from fishing weirs, and then latter a fish tank and not vice versa in history of the word. The fisherman has his name as a Khetu, or Ghetu type terms, which has a lineage to rookeries for fishing for seals by caves or fishing near a cave. The best example of this is the Egyptian term of Qertu, or a Cave. This explains a Cat or Bear cult connected to some cave, or in the act of catching fish near a cave. We now have clear picture of a culture that is Mesolithic at least in age, and the beliefs that may stretch back to in part the post ice age Azillian beliefs. It is clear that Libya, Syria, and Basques had a profound influence on Egyptian terms for there Qetes, Seshshet, or Bast related goddesses before 6,000 BC. Shu and Tefnut now in this light appear to be more modern then Qetes type cats. Shu may be the older of Tefnut and seems to be over all post 6,000 BC in their beginnings or terms. The Qetes Cat seems to be of the Sky and the Cave and has a relationship as a dual sky-earth goddess, her Sun association seems to have been later. If she were the Sun or Moon she seems to be in the domain of the setting versions not rising. For she has a Dekan spot in the sky she pervades over. We do find that at some ancient point Qetes became associated with the Nubians in the form of Bes who later to the Greeks was Ophicius constellation. It would seem some introduction of a very early millet grain that began this association. It would appear the Libyan Azillians traded with the Nubians who in turn brought Bes into the Sudan, which shows why Qetes was dropped for a male version later. We might say Qetes was popular in Spain, Libya, and Syria and finally took hold in the more Northern parts of Egypt. The matriarchal cats of the Egyptian’s Nile River later in the Solar Cult became male ones. The Glozel Tablet shows the Khdhs-z’s as the top and bottom in their separations on the tablet and we can conclude that Qetes of the North River and Qetes of the Southern one were only related in one sense other than by name or different locations in France. That is that it was once believed in France like Egypt that rivers came from ‘Caves in Mountains’ which flowed one to the north and the other to the south and both which then met in the center of the Country of France and Egypt with her twin Niles. This like wise makes a peculiar division of not just the land but of the night sky as well. We get the impression the top part of the tablet is the domain of Orion and the Bear, while the lower part slightly more southern version. This means the Glozel Tablet is more then a fishing trip in different seasons, but a kind of list of gates and gaps likened to an astronomical division placed upon earth. The evidence is provocative for if this is an 11,000 year old writing, and sculpture it is the oldest cartographic notation known to man. There is no indication that it was moved from Spain into the middle of France, because it had a very specific purpose because of its cult associations. And the geo